Chris Makin’s Blog Posts about ‘Litigation’

When Your SJE Gives The “Wrong” Answer

Posted on 9th November 2022 by Chris Makin

The Single Joint Expert (SJE) was developed by Lord Wolf in his Access to Justice, and has featured in the Civil Procedure Rules ever since they were launched. The SJE is very popular with the courts, and no wonder. For example, where there is need to value the family business where a clean break is […]

Read more

Who Writes Your Expert Reports?

Posted on 21st September 2022 by Chris Makin

A silly question, I know, but let’s persevere. It is a rock-solid principle of litigation that the expert must be independent, and that their opinions must be their own.  The leading case is Whitehouse -v- Jordan [1980] UKHL 12, where Lord Wilberforce said:  “The report of the expert must be, and be seen to be, […]

Read more

Expert Meeting? Leave Well Alone!

Posted on 14th September 2022 by Chris Makin

You, dear readers, will be aware from past articles of my recurring theme with experts: choose them with care, choose them early, instruct them fully, and then let them get on with the job.  In particular, choose experts who are not only outstanding in their main profession, but who also have become proficient in their […]

Read more

If You Need To Change Your Expert… 

Posted on 15th June 2022 by Chris Makin

In litigation, the relationship between the expert and the instructing solicitor is an important one.  I have preached in many previous articles about the need to choose your expert with care, and not to tell the trainee to get the cheapest at the latest possible date but choose yourself an expert who is both excellent […]

Read more

The CPR And CrimPR Rules For Experts Really Do Matter

Posted on 11th April 2022 by Chris Makin

This is a morality tale, with some examples of expert witness disasters that were the fault of those who should have known better. First, in the case of R -v- Steven Sulley & Ors, eight defendants were accused of fraud in selling voluntary carbon credits (me neither).  Investigations were carried out by the Metropolitan Police, […]

Read more

The Expert Witness – A Brief History

Posted on 28th March 2022 by Chris Makin

This is a brief history of the expert witness’s involvement in litigation in recent years.  It may help you litigators to brief your experts effectively.  As an expert, I am “plugged in” to the process only at certain stages, so don’t expect me to know all the ins and outs of case management.  I will […]

Read more

It’s Criminal!

Posted on 18th November 2021 by Chris Makin

Practitioners need to be aware that the authorities are taking a hard line with those who abuse the courts.  We see this in two recent matters where straightforward personal injury cases turned into very serious criminal proceedings. Interestingly, both of them concern my home town of Huddersfield, though I stress we are not all criminals […]

Read more

Whose Fault – The Expert’s Or The Solicitor’s?

Posted on 27th October 2021 by Chris Makin

On these pages and in my blogs I have often told lurid stories of expert evidence going wrong, the assumption being that it is the expert who wrecked the case.  But is that always fair, or do you, as instructing solicitor, also bear some responsibility? I respectfully suggest that you do have a duty, particularly […]

Read more

An Expert Warning

Posted on 9th September 2021 by Chris Makin

Don’t let an ill-chosen expert spoil all your good work. Experienced expert witness Chris Makin offers a checklist of experts to avoid. In appointing an expert witness, the first question you should ask is whether this person spends all their time as an expert witness. If so, proceed with caution. A retired medical professional who […]

Read more

Post-Nominals – Do They Matter?

Posted on 16th July 2021 by Chris Makin

This is a moral tale about your choice of expert. A little while ago, I wrote about Andrew Ager, an “expert” appointed by the CPS to give evidence at the trial of some men accused of the sale of voluntary carbon credits (me neither!).  His incompetence, lack of experience and malpractice were quite breathtaking, causing […]

Read more

Chris was able to place all parties at ease in what was a very tense mediation with parties entrenched in their respective positions. Respect was given to all and the correct amount of appropriately placed humour which is essential in cases like this. Chris was able to very much think outside the box and came up with innovative solutions to the problems at hand.